South Sudan; Successful leaders are described by their wise decision

By: Bol Jock

South Sudanese president Salva Kiir (L) shakes hands with rebel leader and former vice-president Riek Machar after signing an agreement at the end of talks ...(file by Nyamilepedia)

South Sudanese president Salva Kiir (L) shakes hands with rebel leader and former vice-president Riek Machar after signing an agreement at the end of talks …(file by Nyamilepedia)

July 24, 2015 (Nyamilepedia) — In 1950, a powerful U.S Army General, MacArthur had a disagreement with the President Truman on how Korean War was being conducted. The General became vocal about the disagreement. The General wanted full-scale war on China and use nuclear weapons on China if necessary. On the other hand, President Truman didn’t want the war to escalate into World War III. Therefore, he wanted the war to be confined to Korea only. As a result of such disagreement, Truman fired General MacArthur despite MacArthur previous heroic actions in WWII and his high support from the American public.

Three days ago, Dr. Riek Machar and his powerful Generals had the same situation. The Generals wanted a full-scale war on Salva Kiir government. They said Kiir committed genocide in Juba on December 15, 2013 so he lost legitimacy to be the president of South Sudan. Any Peace agreement that keeps him as a president is unacceptable. They asked Dr Riek Machar to provide them with weapons and give them order to conduct full-scale war on Kiir juba government if peace agreement will not make Kiir step down. Dr. Riek believes, as much as Juba government committed genocide against South Sudan citizens, it’s not worth destroying the whole country over that matter. He realized that if he gives his Generals weapons and orders to commit to full-scale war, they will stop at nothing short of capturing Juba and Kiir himself.

One General Peter Gatdet Yak was quoted “All I need are weapons and ammunition; I know for sure I can reach Juba. If I die, I know I will not die outside of Juba rather I would die inside after I capture it.” As Dr. Riek weigh his options, he realized that his General are capable of capturing Juba if given enough weapons and ammunition but he also Equate into the solution whether if South Sudan itself will survive after capturing Juba. How long will it take? How many lives, (soldiers and civilians) and infrastructures will be destroyed in the process?

As an example, two days after the Juba massacres, The White Army along with other forces reached approximately 45 KM from reaching Juba. For some reason, they halted the movement for couples of hours outside of Juba until Uganda gunship were able to dismantle them by using cluster bombs. Some people believe they were halted on purpose to not allow them to reach Juba for the same reason. One can’t help but wonder, “If they made it to Juba, were they going to maintain control of it. Or they were going to destroy it, were they going to revenge, or to rescue their loved ones, in another word, would South Sudan survived their penetration to Juba?” Nobody can clearly answer that question since they didn’t make it to Juba.

Such decisions might have been above Dr. Riek to make, but someone made the decision for the White Army to not reached Juba. Could the same people pressure Dr. Riek to not wage a full-scale war against Kiir for the sake of making sure South Sudan survive after this conflict? In conclusion, the decision made by Dr. Riek Machar was tough but a necessary one.

Further, it’s not the first time a powerful and influential General is relieved by a civilian’s leadership. But this is new era of maturity for South Sudan. A new society where civilian’s leadership is superior to military leadership; a democratic era where Generals do not intimidate civilian’s leadership, Instead, they obey orders given to them by civilian leadership. If this case is handled wisely, it will serve as an example for the rest of African leaders to follow. To compare the two scenarios, the decision by Truman is still controversial until this very day but due to America maturity and system set in place for such scenarios, it was handled properly. If a society like South Sudan can do the same thing even with its lack of maturity and lack of systems set in place to deal with it, it would prove to the world that the new nation can surely manage itself.

Bol Kong Ring is a concerned South Sudanese residing in the United State; he can be reach at: bol.ring@yahoo.com


The statements, comments, or opinions published by Nyamilepedia are solely those of their respective authors, which do not necessarily represent the views held by the moderators of Nyamilepedia. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the writer(s), and not the staff and the management of Nyamilepedia.

Nyamilepdeia reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without warning or consultation with the author(s). To publish your article, contact our editorial team at info@nyamile.com. or visit our contact page for further concerns. 

Advertisements

  1 comment for “South Sudan; Successful leaders are described by their wise decision

  1. July 25, 2015 at 8:26 am

    lucky they didn’t made it to Juba, they would have been wipe out clean by security forces. nobody in his/her right mind will allow Nuer to take power by force unless if you accept to be slave to them. Nuer can’t be trusted with power.besides they were Arab collaborators who deserves nothing in South Sudan.

    Like

Post a comment or reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: